Study HIGH Quality ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Free Study Guides and Exams Tutorials
Download PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam Dumps to Pass Exam Easily
NEW QUESTION # 94
所有資訊資產的可接受使用均被禁止，但以下情況除外：
- A. 經過主管/TL 許可的公司範圍內的電子郵件。
- B. 電子連鎖信
- C. 透過電子郵件將副本發送給非必要讀者
- D. 帶有非常大附件或發送給大量收件者的郵件。
Answer: A
Explanation:
The only option that is not prohibited in acceptable use of information assets is C: company-wide e-mails with supervisor/TL permission. This option implies that the sender has obtained the necessary authorization from their supervisor or team leader to send an e-mail to all employees in the organization. This could be done for legitimate business purposes, such as announcing important news, events or updates that are relevant to everyone. However, this option should still be used sparingly and responsibly, as it could cause unnecessary disruption or annoyance to the recipients if abused or misused. The other options are prohibited in acceptable use of information assets, as they could violate the information security policies and procedures of the organization, as well as waste resources and bandwidth. Electronic chain letters (A) are messages that urge recipients to forward them to multiple other people, often with false or misleading claims or promises. They are considered spam and could contain malicious links or attachments that could compromise information security. E-mail copies to non-essential readers (B) are messages that are sent to recipients who do not need to receive them or have no interest in them. They are considered unnecessary and could clutter the inbox and distract the recipients from more important messages. Messages with very large attachments or to a large number of recipients (D) are messages that consume a lot of network resources and could affect the performance or availability of the information systems. They could also exceed the storage capacity or quota limits of the recipients' mailboxes and cause problems for them. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requires the organization to implement rules for acceptable use of assets (see clause A.8.1.3). References: CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology
- Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, What is Acceptable Use?
NEW QUESTION # 95
場景 7：Lawsy 是一家領先的律師事務所，在新澤西州和紐約市設有辦公室。它擁有 50 多名律師，為商業法、智慧財產權、銀行和金融服務領域的客戶提供完善的法律服務。他們相信，由於他們致力於實施資訊安全最佳實踐並跟上技術發展的步伐，他們在市場上佔據了有利的地位。
Lawsy 已經嚴格實施、評估和進行 ISMS 內部審核兩年了。
現在，他們已向知名且值得信賴的認證機構ISMA申請ISO/IEC 27001認證。
在第一階段審核期間，審核小組審查了實施過程中所建立的所有 ISMS 文件。
他們還審查和評估了管理審查和內部審計的記錄。
Lawsy 提交了證據記錄，表明在必要時對不合格項採取了糾正措施，因此審核組約談了內部審核員。訪談透過提供對內部稽核計畫和程序的詳細了解，驗證了內部稽核的充分性和頻率。
審計小組繼續驗證戰略文件，包括資訊安全政策和風險評估標準。在資訊安全政策審查期間，團隊注意到描述治理框架（即資訊安全政策）的記錄資訊與程序之間存在不一致。
儘管允許員工將筆記型電腦帶到工作場所之外，但 Lawsy 並沒有製定有關在這種情況下使用筆記型電腦的程序。此政策僅提供有關筆記型電腦使用的一般資訊。該公司依靠員工的常識來保護筆記型電腦中儲存的資訊的機密性和完整性。該問題已記錄在第一階段審計報告中。
完成第一階段審核後，審核組長準備了審核計劃，其中規定了審核目標、範圍、標準和程序。
在第二階段審核期間，審核小組約談了資安經理，資安經理起草了資訊安全政策。他透過指出 Lawsy 每三個月舉辦一次強制性資訊安全培訓和意識課程來證明第一階段中確定的問題的合理性。
面談後，審核小組檢查了 15 份員工培訓記錄（共 50 份），得出的結論是 Lawsy 符合 ISO/IEC 27001 有關培訓和意識的要求。為了支持這個結論，他們影印了檢查過的員工訓練記錄。
根據上述場景，回答以下問題：
審核員是否應在審核完成後將員工訓練記錄的副本存檔？請參閱場景 7。
- A. 是的，審核期間產生的所有文件化資訊應保留為審核記錄
- B. 否，文件副本通常不會儲存為審核記錄
- C. 是的，如審計協議中所述，審計員擁有文件副本
Answer: B
Explanation:
No, copies of files are not generally kept as audit records unless specifically required and agreed upon in the audit plan. Audit records typically include notes and observations made by auditors, not copies of the auditee's files, unless these are essential and explicitly allowed by the auditee.
References: ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems
NEW QUESTION # 96
下列哪兩項是有效的審計結論？
- A. 兩次內部審核的糾正措施尚未完成
- B. ISMS 政策已有效傳達給組織
- C. 風險登記冊自 202X 年 6 月以來尚未更新
- D. 適用範圍基於 ISO/IEC 27001 2013 版，而非 2022 版
- E. 組織的 ISMS 目標符合 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 的要求
- F. ISMS 入門訓練不提供惡意軟體預防的指導
Answer: B,E
Explanation:
The two statements that are valid audit conclusions are:
*The ISMS policy has been effectively communicated to the organisation
*The organisation's ISMS objectives meet the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 According to ISO 19011:2018, an audit conclusion is the outcome of an audit, provided by the audit team after considering the audit objectives and all audit findings1. An audit conclusion can be positive or negative, depending on whether the audit criteria are fulfilled or not. An audit conclusion can also include recommendations for improvement or recognition of good practices.
The statements D and E are valid audit conclusions, because they express the outcome of the audit based on the audit criteria and findings. For example:
*Statement D is a positive audit conclusion, because it indicates that the organisation has fulfilled the requirement of clause 5.2.2 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which states that the ISMS policy must be communicated within the organisation and to relevant interested parties2. The audit team must have obtained sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to support this conclusion, such as records of communication, awareness activities, feedback, etc.
*Statement E is a positive audit conclusion, because it indicates that the organisation has fulfilled the requirement of clause 6.2 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which states that the organisation must establish ISMS objectives that are consistent with the ISMS policy and relevant to the information security risks3. The audit team must have obtained sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to support this conclusion, such as records of objective setting, risk assessment, alignment with policy, etc.
The other statements are not valid audit conclusions, because they do not express the outcome of the audit based on the audit criteria and findings. They are rather examples of audit findings, which are the results of the evaluation of the collected audit evidence against the audit criteria4. Audit findings can indicate either conformity or nonconformity with the audit criteria, or opportunities for improvement. For example:
*Statement A is a negative audit finding, because it indicates a nonconformity with the requirement of clause
7.2.2 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which states that the organisation must provide information security awareness education and training to persons under its control5. The audit team must have identified and documented this nonconformity, and reported it to the auditee.
*Statement B is a negative audit finding, because it indicates a nonconformity with the requirement of clause
6.1.2 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which states that the organisation must maintain and review the information security risk assessment at planned intervals or when significant changes occur6. The audit team must have identified and documented this nonconformity, and reported it to the auditee.
*Statement C is a negative audit finding, because it indicates a nonconformity with the requirement of clause
10.1 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which states that the organisation must take action to eliminate the causes of nonconformities and prevent recurrence7. The audit team must have identified and documented this nonconformity, and reported it to the auditee.
*Statement F is a negative audit finding, because it indicates a nonconformity with the requirement of clause
6.1.3 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which states that the organisation must determine the controls that are necessary to implement the risk treatment plan, and document them in the statement of applicability8. The audit team must have identified and documented this nonconformity, and reported it to the auditee.
References: 1: ISO 19011:2018, 3.15; 2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 5.2.2; 3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.2; 4: ISO
19011:2018, 3.14; 5: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 7.2.2; 6: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2; 7: ISO/IEC 27001:2022,
10.1; 8: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.3; : ISO 19011:2018; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO
19011:2018; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022
NEW QUESTION # 97
作為審計員，您已經注意到 ABC Inc. 已製定了管理可移動儲存媒體的程序。該程式基於 ABC Inc. 採用的分類方案。另一方面，被歸類為「公共」的資訊沒有保密要求：因此，僅適用確保其完整性和可用性的程序。這是什麼類型的審計結果？
- A. 不合格
- B. 一致性
- C. 異常
Answer: B
Explanation:
This scenario represents a conformity because ABC Inc. has implemented procedures for managing removable storage media that align with the classification scheme of the information stored. When information is classified as "confidential," more stringent procedures apply, whereas for "public" information, the procedures focus only on integrity and availability, following the organization's defined information classification policy.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Clause A.8.2 (Information classification)
NEW QUESTION # 98
在第二階段審核的開幕會議上，客戶組織的總經理邀請審核團隊觀看 45 分鐘的新公司影片。審核組長應做出下列哪兩項回應？
- A. 建議可以在茶歇期間觀看該視頻
- B. 說明審核小組將在稍後對觀看做出決定
- C. 建議總經理審計團隊必須遵守計畫的時間表
- D. 說明審核組長將在開幕會議後留下來代表團隊觀看視頻
- E. 通知總經理審計團隊同意他的請求
- F. 邀請總經理當晚到審計師下榻的飯店參觀。
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
According to ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, an opening meeting is a formal communication between the audit team and the auditee at the start of an audit1. The purpose of the opening meeting is to confirm the audit objectives, scope and criteria, introduce the audit team and their roles, confirm the audit plan and logistics, explain the audit methods and procedures, and establish the communication channels1. Therefore, if the Managing Director of the client organization invites the audit team to view a new company video lasting 45 minutes during the opening meeting of a Stage 2 audit, the audit team leader should respond in a way that does not compromise the effectiveness and efficiency of the audit or create any misunderstanding or conflict with the auditee. Two possible ways to respond are to advise the Managing Director that the audit team has to keep to the planned schedule, as there may be limited time and resources available for the audit; or to suggest that the video could be viewed during a refreshment break, if it is relevant and useful for the audit and does not interfere with other audit activities1. The other options are not appropriate responses for the audit team leader to make in this situation. For example, stating that the audit team leader will stay behind after the opening meeting to view the video on behalf of the team may imply that the video is not important or relevant for the rest of the audit team; inviting the Managing Director to the auditors' hotel for a viewing that evening may create an impression of bias or favouritism; stating that the audit team will make a decision on the viewing at a later time may be vague or indecisive; and advising the Managing Director that the audit team agrees to his request may result in wasting valuable audit time or losing focus on the audit objectives1. References: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems
NEW QUESTION # 99
您是一位經驗豐富的審核團隊領導，指導審核員進行培訓。接受培訓的審核員的任務是審查適用性聲明 (SoA) 中列出的並在現場實施的技術控制措施。
從以下內容中選擇您希望接受培訓的審核員審查的四項控制措施。
- A. 現場閉路電視和門禁系統的運行
- B. 如何實施針對惡意軟體的防護
- C. 進出裝載區的通道
- D. 對人員進行驗證檢查
- E. 在組織內部以及向其他組織傳輸訊息的規則
- F. 供應商協定中如何解決資訊安全問題
- G. 資訊資產清單的發展與維護
- H. 組織如何評估其技術漏洞的暴露程度
- I. 如何管理對原始程式碼和開發工具的訪問
- J. 機構對資訊刪除的安排
- K. 資訊安全意識、教育與培訓
- L. 組織對設備維護的安排
- M. 組織的業務連續性安排
- N. 電源線和資料線如何進入建築物
- O. 保密與保密協議
- P. 遠距工作安排
Answer: A,B,H,I
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), an organization should select and implement appropriate controls to achieve its information security objectives1. The controls should be derived from the results of risk assessment and risk treatment, and should be consistent with the Statement of Applicability (SoA), which is a document that identifies the controls that are applicable and necessary for the ISMS1. The controls can be selected from various sources, such as ISO/IEC 27002:2013, which provides a code of practice for information security controls2. Therefore, if an auditor in training has been tasked with reviewing the technological controls listed in the SoA and implemented at the site of an organization that stores data on behalf of external clients, four controls that would be expected to review are:
* How protection against malware is implemented: This is a technological control that aims to prevent, detect and remove malicious software (such as viruses, worms, ransomware, etc.) that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity or availability of information or information systems2. This control is related to control A.12.2.1 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
* How the organisation evaluates its exposure to technical vulnerabilities: This is a technological control that aims to identify and assess the potential weaknesses or flaws in information systems or networks that could be exploited by malicious actors or cause accidental failures2. This control is related to control A.12.6.1 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
* How access to source code and development tools are managed: This is a technological control that aims to protect the intellectual property rights and integrity of software applications or systems that are developed or maintained by the organization or its external providers2. This control is related to control A:14.2.5 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
* The operation of the site CCTV and door control systems: This is a technological control that aims to monitor and restrict physical access to the premises or facilities where information or information systems are stored or processed2. This control is related to control A.11.1.4 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
The other options are not examples of technological controls, but rather organizational, legal or procedural controls that may also be relevant for an ISMS audit, but are not within the scope of the auditor in training's task. For example, the development and maintenance of an information asset inventory (related to control A.
8.1.1), rules for transferring information within the organization and to other organizations (related to control A.13.2.1), confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements (related to control A.13.2.4), verification checks on personnel (related to control A.7.1.2), remote working arrangements (related to control A.6.2.1), information security within supplier agreements (related to control A.15.1.1), business continuity arrangements (related to control A.17), information deletion (related to control A.8.3), information security awareness, education and training (related to control A.7.2), equipment maintenance (related to control A.11.2), and how power and data cables enter the building (related to control A.11) are not technological controls, but rather organizational, legal or procedural controls that may also be relevant for an ISMS audit, but are not within the scope of the auditor in training's task. References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, ISO/IEC 27002:2013 - Information technology - Security techniques - Code of practice for information security controls
NEW QUESTION # 100
您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核團隊領導者。您目前正在對國際運輸組織進行第三方監督審核。您抽取了四份內部稽核報告，其中指出：
報告 1 - 審計員：詹姆斯先生。
一年來，該組織在 100 次中有 23 次未能滿足其承諾的交付日期。
分級 - 次要
矯正措施到期時間：9 個月內。
報告 2 - 審計員：詹姆斯先生。
1 月至 3 月期間，我們收到了 125 起有關服務台團隊的投訴。客戶指責他們粗魯且反應遲鈍。
分級 - 次要
矯正措施到期時間：12 個月內。
報告 3 - 審計員：詹姆斯先生。
上個月收到的 40 個客戶訂單中，有 38 個已正確處理。其餘 2 份中，一份缺簽名，一份缺日期。
評分 -
更正期間：3週內
報告 4 - 審計員：羅傑斯先生。
在檢查的 30 份人事記錄中，發現 26 份已完全填寫，而其餘 4 份均缺少個人的開始日期。
分級 - 主要
更正期間：1週內
哪四個選項顯示了您對這些報告的擔憂？
- A. 我擔心該組織中是否有不合格品分級標準
- B. 我擔心審核員是否理解糾正和糾正措施之間的區別
- C. 我會擔心，因為解決重大不合格問題的行動應始終早於解決輕微不合格問題的行動完成
- D. 我擔心報告 3 沒有記錄任何評分。
- E. 我擔心沒有進行不合格審查
- F. 我擔心四份報告中解決不合格問題的時間明顯不同
- G. 我擔心審核員只專注於資訊安全流程
- H. 我擔心一名審計師似乎正在執行大部分內部審計
Answer: A,B,D,F
NEW QUESTION # 101
a------------ 的職責包括促進審核活動、維護後勤、確保遵守健康和安全政策以及代表受審核方見證審核過程。
- A. 指南
- B. 內部稽核員
- C. 觀察者
Answer: A
Explanation:
The responsibilities described fit those of a "guide." A guide in an audit context is typically someone from the auditee's organization who facilitates audit activities, manages logistics, ensures compliance with health and safety policies, and may also witness the audit process, assisting the audit team.
References: ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems
NEW QUESTION # 102
應根據審計標準審查下列哪一項以確定審計結果？
- A. 審核結論
- B. 審核範圍
- C. 審核目標
- D. 審計證據
Answer: D
Explanation:
*Audit Findings: These are the results of evaluating collected audit evidence against the predetermined audit criteria.
*Audit Evidence: Objective, verifiable information gathered through interviews, observations, document reviews, etc., that supports the audit findings.
*Audit Criteria: The standards, policies, procedures, or requirements of the ISMS that are used as benchmarks for the audit.
The Process: Auditors compare collected audit evidence against the audit criteria to determine whether there is conformity or nonconformity, leading them to generate audit findings.
References:
*ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Section 9.2 (Internal Audit): Discusses the process of gathering audit evidence and documenting nonconformities (which form a basis for audit findings).
*ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems: Provides a broader framework for audit processes, emphasizing the role of audit evidence in generating findings.
NEW QUESTION # 103
ISMS的標準定義是什麼？
- A. 基於專案的方法，用於實現建立、實施、營運、監控、審查、維護和改進組織資訊安全的業務目標
- B. 用於建立、實施、操作、監控、審查、維護和改進組織的資訊安全以實現業務目標的系統方法。
- C. 是一種資訊安全系統方法，旨在實現實施、建立、審查、營運和維護組織聲譽的業務目標。
- D. 公司範圍內的業務目標，以實現建立、實施、營運、監控、審查、維護和改進的資訊安全意識
Answer: B
Explanation:
The standard definition of ISMS is a systematic approach for establishing, implementing, operating, monitoring, reviewing, maintaining and improving an organization's information security to achieve business objectives. This definition is given in clause 3.17 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and it describes the main components and purpose of an ISMS. An ISMS is not a project-based approach, as it is an ongoing process that requires continual improvement. An ISMS is not a company wide business objective, as it is a management system that supports the organization's objectives. An ISMS is not an information security systematic approach, as it is a broader concept that encompasses the organization's context, risks, controls, and performance. References: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 15. : ISO
/IEC 27001:2022, clause 3.17.
NEW QUESTION # 104
您是經驗豐富的審核團隊領導，指導審核員進行培訓。
您的團隊目前正在對代表外部客戶儲存資料的組織進行第三方監督審核。接受培訓的審核員的任務是審查適用性聲明 (SoA) 中列出的並在現場實施的實體控制措施。
從以下內容中選擇您希望接受培訓的審核員審查的四項控制措施。
- A. 現場閉路電視和門禁系統的運行
- B. 電源線和資料線如何進入建築物
- C. 對人員進行驗證檢查
- D. 資訊資產清單的開發與維護
- E. 資訊安全意識、教育與培訓
- F. 組織維護設備的安排
- G. 組織的業務連續性安排
- H. 進出裝載區的通道
Answer: A,B,F,H
Explanation:
The four controls from the list that are related to PHYSICAL aspects of the ISMS are:
*Access to and from the loading bay
*How power and data cables enter the building
*The operation of the site CCTV and door control systems
*The organisation's arrangements for maintaining equipment
These controls are derived from the ISO 27001 Annex A, which provides a comprehensive list of information security controls that can be applied to an ISMS1. The other controls in the list are more related to ORGANIZATIONAL, LEGAL, or HUMAN aspects of the ISMS, which are also important, but not the focus of this question.
According to the ISMS Auditing Guideline2, the auditor in training should review the PHYSICAL controls by:
*Checking the SoA to identify the applicable controls and their implementation status
*Interviewing the relevant staff and management to verify their understanding and involvement in the controls
*Observing the physical and environmental conditions to confirm the existence and effectiveness of the controls
*Examining the relevant documents and records to validate the compliance and performance of the controls I hope this helps you prepare for the exam. # References: 1: What Are ISO 27001 Controls? A Guide to Annex A | Secureframe; 2: ISMS Auditing Guideline - ISO27000
NEW QUESTION # 105
下列哪兩個短語是與第一方審核相關的「目標」？
- A. 為認證機構準備審核報告
- B. 應用監理要求
- C. 應用國際標準
- D. 按時完成審核
- E. 確認管理系統的範圍準確
- F. 更新管理策略
Answer: E,F
Explanation:
A first-party audit is an internal audit conducted by the organization itself or by an external party on its behalf. The objectives of a first-party audit are to: 12
* Confirm the scope of the management system is accurate, i.e., it covers all the processes, activities, locations, and functions that are relevant to the information security objectives and requirements of the organization.
* Update the management policy, i.e., review and revise the policy statement, roles and responsibilities, and objectives and targets of the information security management system (ISMS) based on the audit findings and feedback.
The other phrases are not objectives of a first-party audit, but rather:
* Apply international standards: This is a requirement for the ISMS, not an objective of the audit. The ISMS must conform to the ISO/IEC 27001 standard and any other applicable standards or regulations12
* Prepare the audit report for the certification body: This is an activity of a third-party audit, not a first- party audit. A third-party audit is an external audit conducted by an independent certification body to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the ISMS and to issue a certificate of compliance12
* Complete the audit on time: This is a performance indicator, not an objective of the audit. The audit should be completed within the planned time frame and budget, but this is not the primary purpose of the audit12
* Apply regulatory requirements: This is also a requirement for the ISMS, not an objective of the audit. The ISMS must comply with the legal and contractual obligations of the organization regarding information security12 References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2
NEW QUESTION # 106
起草審核結論後，審核組長的工作文件由認證機構選定的另一位審核員進行審核。這是可以接受的嗎？
- A. 是的，審核組長的工作文件在得出審核結論後必須由另一位審核員審核
- B. 不，只有審核組長審核每位審核員的工作文件
- C. 不可以，在得出審核結論前必須檢討審核組組長的工作
Answer: A
Explanation:
Yes, it is acceptable for the work documents of the audit team leader to be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions. This is part of the quality control and assurance processes within the audit to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the audit conclusions.
References: ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems
NEW QUESTION # 107
您正在一家名為 ABC 的提供醫療保健服務的住宅療養院進行 ISMS 審核。您會發現所有療養院居民都戴著電子腕帶，用於監控他們的位置、心跳和血壓。您了解到，電子腕帶會自動將所有資料上傳到人工智慧（AI）雲端伺服器，供醫護人員進行健康監測和分析。
為了驗證 ISMS 的範圍，您採訪了管理系統代表 (MSR)，他解釋說 ISMS 範圍涵蓋外包資料中心。
為 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 與 ISMS 範圍驗證直接相關的條款和/或控制選擇四個選項。
- A. 控制措施 7.6 在安全區域工作
- B. 第 5.2 條政策
- C. 控制措施 5.3 組織角色、職責與權限
- D. 控制措施 6.3 資訊安全意識、教育與培訓
- E. 第 4.2 條了解相關方的需求與期望
- F. 控制措施 5.3 法律、法規、監管和合約要求
- G. 條款 4.1 了解組織及其背景
- H. 第 4.3 條決定資訊安全管理系統的範圍
Answer: B,E,G,H
Explanation:
* B. This clause requires the organisation to determine the interested parties that are relevant to the ISMS, and the requirements of these interested parties12. This clause is relevant to the verification of the scope of the ISMS because it helps the organisation to identify the stakeholders that have an influence or an interest in the information security of the organisation, such as customers, suppliers, regulators, employees, etc. The organisation should also consider the needs and expectations of these interested parties when defining the scope of the ISMS, and ensure that they are met and communicated.
* E. This clause requires the organisation to establish an information security policy that provides the framework for setting the information security objectives and guiding the information security activities13. This clause is relevant to the verification of the scope of the ISMS because it helps the organisation to define the direction and principles of the ISMS, and to align them with the strategic goals and context of the organisation. The information security policy should also be consistent with the scope of the ISMS, and should be communicated and understood within the organisation and by relevant interested parties.
* F. This clause requires the organisation to determine the internal and external issues that are relevant to the purpose and the context of the organisation, and that affect its ability to achieve the intended outcomes of the ISMS14. This clause is relevant to the verification of the scope of the ISMS because it helps the organisation to understand the factors and conditions that influence the information security of the organisation, such as the legal, technological, social, economic, environmental, etc. The organisation should also monitor and review these issues, and consider them when defining the scope of the ISMS.
* H. This clause requires the organisation to determine the boundaries and applicability of the ISMS to establish its scope15. This clause is relevant to the verification of the scope of the ISMS because it helps the organisation to describe the information and processes that are included in the ISMS, and to document the scope in a clear and concise manner. The organisation should also consider the issues, requirements, and interfaces identified in clauses 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 when determining the scope of the ISMS, and ensure that the scope is appropriate to the nature and scale of the organisation.
References:
1: PECB Candidate Handbook - ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 17 2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause
4.2 3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 5.2 4: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 4.1 5: ISO/IEC
27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 4.3
NEW QUESTION # 108
您正在進行 ISMS 審核。審計計劃的下一步是驗證組織的資訊安全風險處理計劃是否已製定並正確實施。您決定採訪 IT 安全經理。
您：能否請您解釋一下組織是如何進行資訊安全風險評估和處理流程的？
IT 安全經理：我們遵循資訊安全風險管理程序，產生風險處理計劃。
旁白：您回顧了第 123 號風險處理計劃，該計劃涉及計劃安裝電子（隱形）圍欄，以提高療養院的物理安全。您發現風險處理計劃已獲得 IT 安全經理的批准。
您：誰要為實體安全風險負責？
IT 安全經理：設施經理負責實體安全風險。 IT部門幫助他們監控警報。授權設施經理批准123號風險處理計畫的預算。
您：123號風險處置預案實施後，還有哪些資訊安全風險殘留？
IT安全經理：據我了解，目前還沒有關於殘留資訊安全風險接受的資訊。
您準備您的審計結果。為場景中合理的發現選擇三個選項。
- A. 有一個改進機會 (OI)，可以對週邊圍欄進行安全檢查
- B. 一旦安裝了電子（隱形）圍欄，就有改進的機會（OI）。
居民人身安全得到改善 - C. 不合格 (NC) - 第 123 號風險處理計畫應由風險負責人（在本例中為設施經理）批准。第 6.1.3.f 條
- D. 不合格（NC）－風險處理實施後，應更新殘餘資訊安全風險的接受資訊。第 6.1.3.f 條
- E. 不合格 (NC) - 組織應提供持續改善 ISMS 所需的資源。第 7.1 條
- F. 不合格 (NC) - IT 安全經理應該意識到並理解他的權限和責任範圍。第7.3條
- G. 採用最先進的技術作為持續改進流程的一部分是良好的做法
- H. 不合格 (NC) - 最高管理階層必須確保 ISMS 所需的資源可用。第 5.1.c 條
Answer: C,D,F
Explanation:
The three options for findings that are justified in the scenario are:
*Nonconformity (NC) - The information for the acceptance of residual information security risks should be updated after the risk treatment is implemented. Clause 6.1.3.f
*Nonconformity (NC) - The IT security manager should be aware of and understand his authority and area of responsibility. Clause 7.3
*Nonconformity (NC) - The risk treatment plan No. 123 should be approved by the risk owner, the Facility Manager in this case. Clause 6.1.3.f According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3.f, the organisation must retain documented information that includes the information for the acceptance of residual information security risks, and the approval of the risk treatment plan by the risk owner1. Therefore, option A and G are justified as nonconformities, because the organisation failed to update the information for the acceptance of residual risks, and the risk treatment plan was approved by the IT security manager, who is not the risk owner.
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 7.3, the organisation must ensure that the persons assigned to perform the roles and responsibilities for the ISMS are competent, and are aware of the consequences of not conforming to the ISMS requirements2. Therefore, option E is justified as a nonconformity, because the IT security manager, who is responsible for the information security risk management process, was not aware of his authority and area of responsibility.
The other options are not justified as findings, because they are either irrelevant or incorrect. For example:
*Option B is irrelevant, because it is not related to the information security risk treatment plan No. 123, which is the focus of the audit.
*Option C is incorrect, because it is not an opportunity for improvement, but rather a benefit of the risk treatment plan No. 123, which is already implemented.
*Option D is incorrect, because it is not a nonconformity, but rather a requirement for the organisation to provide the resources needed for the ISMS, which is not the same as the resources needed for the risk treatment plan No. 123.
*Option F is incorrect, because it is not a nonconformity, but rather a requirement for the organisation to provide the resources needed for the continual improvement of the ISMS, which is not the same as the resources needed for the risk treatment plan No. 123.
*Option H is irrelevant, because it is not a finding, but rather a good practice, which is not the objective of the audit.
References: 1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.3.f; 2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 7.3; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC
27001:2022
NEW QUESTION # 109
下列哪一項最能描述第二階段第三方審核的主要目的？
- A. 了解組織的管理體系
- B. 辨識不符合標準的情況
- C. 檢查組織是否遵守法律
- D. 確定認證準備狀況
Answer: B
Explanation:
The main purpose of a Stage 2 third-party audit is to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the organisation's management system and to identify any nonconformances against the requirements of the standard12. The other options are either the objectives of a Stage 1 audit (A, D) or a specific aspect of the audit scope (B). References: 1: ISO/IEC 27006:2022, Information technology - Security techniques - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of information security management systems, Clause 9.2 \n2: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Exam Preparation Guide, Domain 4: Preparing an ISO/IEC 27001 audit
NEW QUESTION # 110
根據發現的不合格項。 A 公司製定了行動計劃，其中包括發現的不合格項、根本原因以及關於將採取的每項行動的一般說明。這是可以接受的嗎？
- A. 不，行動計劃應包括有關將安裝的系統以及這些系統將如何消除根本原因的信息
- B. 是的，受審核方必須提交行動計劃，其中包括有關將採取的行動的一般聲明
- C. 否，受審核方必須提交行動計劃，其中包括有關如何實施每項糾正措施的詳細信息
Answer: C
Explanation:
The auditee is required to submit action plans that include detailed information on how every corrective action will be implemented. General statements are not sufficient; the action plans must specify the corrective actions in detail to ensure that the root causes of the nonconformities are addressed effectively.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Clause 10.1 (General) and ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems.
NEW QUESTION # 111
您正在作為審核組組長進行首次第三方 ISMS 監督審核。您目前與審核團隊的另一位成員以及組織的指南一起位於受審核方的資料中心。
您要求進入受密碼鎖和虹膜掃描器保護的上鎖房間。此房間包含幾排不間斷電源以及幾個包含客戶端提供的設備（主要是伺服器和交換器）的資料櫃。
您注意到有一個氣體滅火系統。標籤表示系統需要每 6 個月進行一次測試，但標籤上記錄的最近一次測試是製造商在 12 個月前進行的。
根據上述情況，您現在會採取下列哪兩項操作？
- A. 確定記錄滅火器檢查的要求是否在去年進行了修訂。
如果是這樣，建議在現有標籤上引用這些內容作為改進的機會 - B. 針對控制 A.7.11「支援公用設施」提出不符合項，因為資訊處理設施沒有充分保護以防止可能的中斷
- C. 做筆記，向現場維修經理索取6個月前進行過滅火系統測試的證據
- D. 由於組織尚未確定需要針對火災威脅採取行動，因此針對控制 A.5.7「威脅情報」提出不符合項
- E. 需要指南來啟動組織的資訊安全事件流程
- F. 如果房間內有水基滅火器，則無需採取進一步行動，因為它們提供了另一種滅火方法
Answer: B,C
NEW QUESTION # 112
......
Get 100% Real Free ISO 27001 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Sample Questions: https://www.dumpsactual.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN-actualtests-dumps.html
Accurate ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Questions with Free and Fast Updates: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1K7ujbOxkRVB4EnLfelVSRFrrC7gsf4xg
